public-l AT list.denic.de
Subject: Public DENIC mailinglist
List archive
- From: Peter Koch <pk AT TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
- To: public-l AT denic.de
- Subject: Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:19:49 +0200
> oeffentlicher Dienst, den TLD-Registrare zu erbringen haben. Tuen sie es
> nicht, werden sie von ICANN schlicht der Verwaltungshoheit enthoben.
Indem ICANN die nicht vorhandenen Vertraege mit den ccTLDs kuendigt?
Oder indem ICANN sich auf ICP-1 (== RFC 1591) beruft?
-Peter Koch
- Re: Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, (continued)
- Re: Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Markus Warg, 07/24/2002
- AW: Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Frank Loewe, 07/24/2002
- Re[4]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, P.B., 07/24/2002
- AW: Re[4]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Frank Loewe, 07/25/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Besim Karadeniz, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07/24/2002
- Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, P.B., 07/24/2002
- [DENICpublic-l] Whois-Probleme, Nikolai Tiedemann, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] Whois-Probleme, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Peter Koch, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Daniel Roesen, 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Peter Koch, 07/24/2002
- Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, P.B., 07/24/2002
- Re: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, Michael van Elst, 07/24/2002
- Re[2]: [DENICpublic-l] AW: Whois-Probleme, P.B., 07/24/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.